Latest activity

OK. So I will agree to the rule of no proselytizing into TO, which was never my intention anyway but still maintain the utility and pragmatism of Old Testament scripture. That is why I asked for a conversation that was "scripture only, no...

But it makes a mockery of their claim, and very purpose. Some of us simply suggest that a ministry that promises to serve Him, and discuss His Word, particularly with regards to marriage, should actually do so -- completely, and honestly. The...

Exodus 13 11And it shall be when Yahweh shall bring thee into the land of the Canaanites, as he sware unto thee and to thy fathers, and shall give it thee, 12 That thou shalt set apart unto Yahweh all that openeth the matrix, and every...

After a little time and distance, I too believe this is what happened here. She was under intense pressure to conform. I've been around. I know real chemistry when it happens. It isn't every day that we form a connection this strong. I'm...

I think you are trying to point out the ""rule of equivalency"" is a bad rule. I agree! There are rules for men and there are rules for women. They don't always end up being the same rules. Just as there are rules for priests that do not apply...

If the astronomer wanted to discuss physics, then he could go to a site that is open to and caters for such a discussion. There is no need for making such a situation contentious if the owners of the site don't want physics to be discussed on...

Yes!

Perhaps. Or it could be, "go find someone who wants to play by your rules on their court."

If the astronomer wanted to discuss physics, then he could go to a site that is open to and caters for such a discussion. There is no need for making such a situation contentious if the owners of the site don't want physics to be discussed on...

It's a simple rule. Just stop trying to find ways around it!

OK. So I will agree to the rule of no proselytizing into TO, which was never my intention anyway but still maintain the utility and pragmatism of Old Testament scripture. That is why I asked for a conversation that was "scripture only, no...

Perhaps. Or it could be, "go find someone who wants to play by your rules on their court."

Is that like, "go buy your own basketball court to play on!" ?

If the astronomer wanted to discuss physics, then he could go to a site that is open to and caters for such a discussion. There is no need for making such a situation contentious if the owners of the site don't want physics to be discussed on...

Why can you not see it? It's not "finding ways around it" to try and discuss things that NEED to be discussed, because they ARE in Scripture, and they are intimately related! Ask an astronomer to discuss the motion of stars, but then forbid...