Latest activity

Definitely. Leave them to me. :cool:

As others have pointed out, it is not really the body type that is attractive. It is the confidence. The thing is that improving your physique can lead to confidence, but if you can have the confidence without the physique you can still be...

True. You want to be attractive to the type of person you want to catch. :)

Link to funny video: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/humor/a-great-story/

True. You want to be attractive to the type of person you want to catch. :)

I hear what you’re saying, but I’m old enough to remember when Sean Connery was People Magazine sexiest man. He was late 50s/early 60s, balding, grey haired and sort of dad bod (not fat, but no longer svelt). It was partly his exotic accent...

The psychology to the whole thing is very interesting. When approaching a mixed set, you introduce yourself to the men first. You want to come across as a fellow man. You do not want to slink around and try to pick off women when the men in...

I'm familiar with a lot of the red pill, game, and pick up literature. Like you said, most of it is oriented towards those who wish to seduce women and engage in sexual immorality. We don't want to do that sort of thing. At the same time, I...

It looks like Rob Kowalski has a new book out that he is taking pre-sale orders for called "Man of Options". https://www.robbkowalski.com/man-of-options-book I like the title. I have long thought that not every man needed to be a polygamist...

No that would be the fallacy of Ad Populum. Exactly, and not even myself alone. The fact that no one has been able to produce such a verse when challenged on it, is evidence that it is not to be found in a finite set of texts. IOW, given...

Ahh but we CAN SHOW that at the council at Trent THEY DID MAKE THE NEW ASSERTION. That is when the church decided that scripture guidance alone was insufficient for marriages or divorces to be made. THAT was also when they prescribed...

Is the legal system sophomoric and meaningless? The concept of burden of proof is what a grand jury is all about. If the state is making a claim, the state is obligated to bring the proof first before the contra is introduced. No proof means no...

Oh you need proof for that????!!!!! OK that is the very definition of the "Proof by Assertion" fallacy. Making an assertion without proof, if we were supposed to just take that on face value, anyone could make an assertion! It ought to be plainly...

Ahh but we CAN SHOW that at the council at Trent THEY DID MAKE THE NEW ASSERTION. That is when the church decided that scripture guidance alone was insufficient for marriages or divorces to be made. THAT was also when they prescribed...

Link to funny video: https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/humor/a-great-story/