Latest activity

Most modern Christians are catholic affirming, whether they realize it or not! Proverbs 17:15 says ANYONE who moves the line from where YHWH put it is abomination to Him. Condemning the just is as wrong as justifying the wicked. They prefer to...

You are in great company, check out the threads about the left foot of fellowship. The enemy of our souls hates and fears this truth greatly. When you start sharing it you become a target lit up in neon on his radar. New levels, new devils...

Thanks for the link. I’ll take a look. I think Mr. Kowalski is perfectly suited for his niche. It takes a certain skill set to podcast and make YT videos. Not everyone is good at it. It’s good that he has that skill set because in person, I...

Most modern Christians are catholic affirming, whether they realize it or not! Proverbs 17:15 says ANYONE who moves the line from where YHWH put it is abomination to Him. Condemning the just is as wrong as justifying the wicked. They prefer to...

Thanks for the link. I’ll take a look. I think Mr. Kowalski is perfectly suited for his niche. It takes a certain skill set to podcast and make YT videos. Not everyone is good at it. It’s good that he has that skill set because in person, I...

I know Rob and talk to him often. He works his @ss off for the polygyny movement. Some probably criticize his background but I don’t think there is anyone out there currently doing more for the movement.

I've got a few concerns about Rob based on what I have seen so far. Unlike you, I haven't met him in person, so I have less to base my opinion on. Like you said, he is definitely a mover and a shaker! He gets stuff done, and that means a lot...

Most modern Christians are catholic affirming, whether they realize it or not! Proverbs 17:15 says ANYONE who moves the line from where YHWH put it is abomination to Him. Condemning the just is as wrong as justifying the wicked. They prefer to...

that sounds like you're describing an antinomian and those are the 99% of dummies thinking paul and jesus changed the law or that they even could. not worth arguing with. my teacher is a pronomian calvinist, like foster. so, "nt supremacy," no...

That’s a heavy burden to try to decipher. Is the contention that God changes it for different times and people (relative?) Or he is above the Law and is not bound to it as sovereign?

I know you mentioned it before, but I can’t remember: Is your teacher one who leans more towards NT supremacy?

i think when combined with 2 ch 24:1-3 it's functionally a proof text. my teacher (who has been fighting this) agreed. that serves as a pretty strong proof for the OT but there still remains the apparent contentions in the NT and I think they...

Was the point just to illustrate the kind of flawed logic often used by scoffers to dismiss cases of polygyny in Scripture? Joash is not a 'proof text' - just an example. There are many. And there are proof texts, too.

I think it is important to note that the scripture says that Joash "did what was right". That assigns agency to Joash and his decisions and actions are what are being called "right in the sight of the LORD". 2 Kings 12:2 KJV And Jehoash did...

"x did what was right in sight of yahweh" is a formulaic statement which does not imply x did not sin. the text assigns agency for josiah's polygamy to jehoiada. therefore, it should be assumed that josiah is not responsible. therefore, it is...